top of page

PM Speaks: Tough Choices for Mongolia's Future

  • Writer: Amar Adiya
    Amar Adiya
  • Mar 16, 2025
  • 2 min read

Mongolia's economic trajectory remains tightly bound to its mineral wealth. A recent interview from Prime Minister Luvsannamsrain Oyun-Erdene underscores the government's focus on maximizing the benefits of this endowment, but also highlights the inherent tensions in this development model.


Mongolia prime minister

The government's assertive stance in disputes with private companies and its focus on "strategic deposits" indicate a significant rise in resource patriotism. The desire to channel resource revenues into the National Wealth Fund (Chinggis Fund) is a legitimate aspiration. However, the execution of this policy demands finesse.


The government's position, rooted in a 2007 parliamentary resolution, is that at least 34% of a strategic deposit should be state-owned, with potential for this to increase to 50% if state funds were used for its discovery. While holding companies accountable is important, a climate of uncertainty and frequent renegotiations can deter crucial investment.


Mongolia must tread carefully to balance national interests with the need to project itself as a reliable partner when competing for investment globally. This is particularly relevant given that many deposits, beyond the high-profile ones like Erdenet, Tavan Tolgoi, and Oyu Tolgoi, have partial ownership by foreign parties like Chinese and Singaporean.


The public and media focus is currently on MCS's Ukhaa Khudag coal mine (part of Tavan Tolgoi giant coal basin). The government must ensure that its application of the "strategic deposit" policy is consistent and does not disproportionately target specific companies or investors.


The Prime Minister's depiction of Mongolia's economic growth, visualized by the analogy of a "40-liter can" (~MNT 43 trillion GDP in 2021) expanding to an "80-liter barrel," (~MNT 80 trillion GDP in 2025) warrants a nuanced interpretation. While nominal GDP figures indicate expansion, the real economic expansion could be more modest when accounting for inflation.


Furthermore, the Prime Minister rightly acknowledges the risks of resource dependence. Beyond the Chinggis Fund, the government is pursuing 14 mega infrastructure and energy projects to contribute to economic diversification. The challenge remains to diversify the economy beyond mining, fostering sectors that can create sustainable employment and reduce vulnerability to commodity price fluctuations.


The government's interventionist approach, often justified by the need to rectify past inequalities and ensure equitable distribution of resource wealth, presents its own set of challenges. The ongoing disputes surrounding key assets like Erdenet (49%), Oyu Tolgoi (tax), and Tavan Tolgoi (Ukhaa Khudag) exemplify this. While addressing historical grievances is important, the government's actions must be perceived as fair, transparent, and consistent with the rule of law.


The final resolution of the Erdenet case, where TDB bank's owner Erdenebileg remains in self-exile in Singapore, could set a precedent for compensation in future disputes. The Oyu Tolgoi tax issue also remains unresolved.


The Prime Minister's stated focus on tackling the "resource curse" and addressing the concentration of wealth among a few elite families is a welcome objective, but its success will depend on the implementation of effective and equitable policies.


The legislative spring session kicks off on March 17, 2025, and the resolution on Ukhaa Khudag coal mine is expected to be high on the agenda.

Comments


bottom of page